<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=8&amp;t=380" />

<title>The Eye Tribe</title>
<subtitle>Developer Forum</subtitle>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/index.php" />
<updated>2015-09-17T18:15:03+02:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[The Eye Tribe]]></name></author>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=8&amp;t=380</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Nathalie]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-09-17T18:15:03+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-09-17T18:15:03+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2275#p2275</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2275#p2275"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2275#p2275"><![CDATA[
Thank you very much =)<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=8175">skataNathalie</a> — 17 Sep 2015, 18:15</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Martin]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-09-16T16:38:43+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-09-16T16:38:43+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2273#p2273</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2273#p2273"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2273#p2273"><![CDATA[
It is a dark pupil tracker as opposed to on-axis bright pupil systems. <br /><br />In general, the algorithms employ a number steps to find an ellipse of reasonable size and shape in the eye region.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=117">skataMartin</a> — 16 Sep 2015, 16:38</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Nathalie]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-09-08T13:05:24+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-09-08T13:05:24+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2262#p2262</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2262#p2262"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=2262#p2262"><![CDATA[
Hello Martin <img src="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><br /><br />I also have a question to 1.<br />Can you tell me (in gernal) how the Pupils in the picture are recognized?<br />Because the camera of the TET sits in the middle of the TET - away from the LEDs - so there isn't on-axis lighting and consequently no bright-eye-effekt in the Pupils.<br /><br />I work with the TET for my bachelor thesis and I need to describe the gernal functions of the TET in my thesis.<br />Thanks! <img src="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=8175">skataNathalie</a> — 08 Sep 2015, 13:05</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Martin]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-01-13T15:25:03+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-01-13T15:25:03+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1633#p1633</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1633#p1633"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1633#p1633"><![CDATA[
Hi Jean,<br /><br />As Jeff suggested it would be really helpful if you could send a calibration feedback report to us so we can look into this issue (the collected data is encrypted and never shared). <br /><br />This function is found under the System tab in EyeTribeUI. <br /><br />To your questions,<br /><br />1. Correct, it searches for faces and eyes based on feature detection. Then it continues to search for the pupil and other eye features. Hard to diagnose the specific issue without more data. Hand drawn  eyes will most likely no be detected. <br /><br />2. The software is designed to work with any iris color, should not be an issue. What could be problematic is makeup and long eye lashes if they overlap. In general it takes a clear view of the eye with sufficient contrast to get a good signal. <br /><br />Storing calibration profiles is on the way. Next version will automatically load up the latest calibration on start.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=117">skataMartin</a> — 13 Jan 2015, 15:25</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[JeffKang]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-01-09T03:05:09+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-01-09T03:05:09+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1624#p1624</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1624#p1624"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1624#p1624"><![CDATA[
<blockquote><div><cite>jean.lorenceau@upmc.fr wrote:</cite><br />we encounter problems with eyes detection for some individuals<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />Be sure to send some feedback data on those attempts.<br />Something that abnormal could be provide some good information for future versions.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2379">skataJeffKang</a> — 09 Jan 2015, 03:05</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[jean.lorenceau@upmc.fr]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-01-08T18:53:11+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-01-08T18:53:11+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1622#p1622</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1622#p1622"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1622#p1622"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br /><br />Not sure this really adddress the point, but we encounter problems with eyes detection for some individuals: it may take minutes just to get the &quot;green&quot; eyes in the UI interface  (and sometimes we fail to get any acceptable signals, so that calibration fails several times in a row!). Our physical configuration is very similar to all those I've seen in this forum so far, and the exactly same setup can work easily with someone and fail with another person. Very very annoying because we cannot figure out what is going on, and moving around the EyeTribe to try to catch the eyes is uneasy and provides little on line feedback (Red/Green background is poor information). So questions: <br />1. Is the EyeTribe algorithm detecting the eyes relying on any face processing algorithm? <br />2. Are some eye/face features detected more easily than others (iris color, eyebrow??) . What are these features ?<br />I tried to test the calibration with faked eyes (e.g. Drawing dark pupils on a sheet of paper), but could never manage to have these faked eyes detected ...<br />The new possiblity to store the calibration settings might help go aound this problem, but it is nevertheless a problem that Eye detection  is unreliable and unpredictable ... <br /><br />Please Help and provide advices and solutions, as we are about to use TheEyeTribe on a large population !<br />Thanks  !<br />Jean<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2434">skatajean.lorenceau@upmc.fr</a> — 08 Jan 2015, 18:53</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Martin]]></name></author>
<updated>2014-12-11T01:25:41+02:00</updated>
<published>2014-12-11T01:25:41+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1568#p1568</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1568#p1568"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1568#p1568"><![CDATA[
Hi Mikael,<br /><br />Thanks for sharing your thoughts, I really appreciate it and agree on all counts.<br />We have user profiles on the road map, stay tuned.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=117">skataMartin</a> — 11 Dec 2014, 01:25</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[mlv@bkmed.dk]]></name></author>
<updated>2014-12-08T15:10:02+02:00</updated>
<published>2014-12-08T15:10:02+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1555#p1555</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1555#p1555"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Calibration and multiple users]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=380&amp;p=1555#p1555"><![CDATA[
This is a feature request:<br />Having to go through a calibration process is tedious to any user. If you want to use gaze tracking as a GUI input device,<br />this is a cause for concern. The ideal system would be self-calibrating in some way.<br /><br />Waiting for that to appear, at least we need to make sure that calibration only has to take place once. For a single<br />user that is mostly the case today. The calibration data is persisted. However for an  application with multiple<br />users that is not the case. Each time the user changes, a new calibration must be done and the old calibration data<br />is lost.<br /><br />It would be desirable for the api to offer some control of the calibration data, so that an application can change between<br />several user profiles. Each user would then only have to calibrate the first time he or she uses the system.<br /><br />E.g. the client could provide an id for a given calibration. The server should not delete calibrations with an id, except<br />when explicitly being told so. The client should be able to re-activate stored calibrations.<br /><br />Or, alternatively the server could make the calibration data avaliable to the client. The client would then be able to associate<br />the data with a given user and store it. Subsequently, the client would be able to change user profiles and send stored calibration<br />data to the server in order to re-activate a previous calibration.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Mikael<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1925">skatamlv@bkmed.dk</a> — 08 Dec 2014, 15:10</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>