<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=8&amp;t=626" />

<title>The Eye Tribe</title>
<subtitle>Developer Forum</subtitle>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/index.php" />
<updated>2016-08-07T22:59:40+02:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[The Eye Tribe]]></name></author>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=8&amp;t=626</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[JeffKang]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-08-07T22:59:40+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-08-07T22:59:40+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=626&amp;p=2608#p2608</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=626&amp;p=2608#p2608"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Going from 9 to 16 calibration points stops jittery tracking]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=626&amp;p=2608#p2608"><![CDATA[
A couple days ago, I was noticing that the tracking was getting a bit spotty.<br /><br />I then noticed that I had my calibration points set at 9.<br /><br />I usually have it at the maximum points, but during some time, it was reset.<br /><br />It's possible that the tracking recovery is coincidental, and 9 points is usually adequate.<br /><br />I wonder what would happen if you could use more points, but I'm guessing that there are diminishing returns.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2379">skataJeffKang</a> — 07 Aug 2016, 22:59</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>