<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=27&amp;t=393" />

<title>The Eye Tribe</title>
<subtitle>Developer Forum</subtitle>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/index.php" />
<updated>2015-02-16T09:45:53+02:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[The Eye Tribe]]></name></author>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=27&amp;t=393</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[warbyrd]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-02-16T09:45:53+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-02-16T09:45:53+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1736#p1736</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1736#p1736"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration Quality]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1736#p1736"><![CDATA[
I wrote a custom calibration procedure (in JavaScript) and could not get above 2 stars - for all those who have a similar problem:<br /><br />i solved that issue, by<span style="font-weight: bold"> giving the user time to rest his eyes for ~500ms before starting to collect data </span>(sending 'pointstart') in every point. and not - like before - jump from one point to another - that gave me <br /><br />huge errors - like 15 degrees and such. - this could be mentioned in the calibration api to help former developers, maybe.<br /><br />now i easily get 5 stars with my own procedure <img src="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /> and implemented your star-ranking, too - thank you for pointing that out to me.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=5371">skatawarbyrd</a> — 16 Feb 2015, 09:45</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[joaquin]]></name></author>
<updated>2015-02-05T18:34:01+02:00</updated>
<published>2015-02-05T18:34:01+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1705#p1705</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1705#p1705"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Calibration Quality]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1705#p1705"><![CDATA[
check <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=332&amp;sid=7f0072b664dbf09d3f143538602e519f" class="postlink">http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=332&amp;sid=7f0072b664dbf09d3f143538602e519f</a><br /><br /><dl class="codebox"><dt>Code: </dt><dd><code>            if (accuracy &lt; 0.5) // perfect<br />                return 5; <br /><br />            if (accuracy &lt; 0.7) // moderate etc.<br />                return 4;<br /><br />            if (accuracy &lt; 1)<br />                return 3;<br /><br />            if (accuracy &lt; 1.5)<br />                return 2;<br />  <br />            return 1; // redo<br /> </code></dd></dl><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=7108">skatajoaquin</a> — 05 Feb 2015, 18:34</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[warbyrd]]></name></author>
<updated>2014-12-29T14:29:59+02:00</updated>
<published>2014-12-29T14:29:59+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1605#p1605</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1605#p1605"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Calibration Quality]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=393&amp;p=1605#p1605"><![CDATA[
How exactly is the 5-star ranking in the EyeTribeUI defined - is it just the average error? Or does it some more fancy calculation to define the quality?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=5371">skatawarbyrd</a> — 29 Dec 2014, 14:29</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>